Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for analysis.Overall visual revision did not identify failures or evidence that could be lost due to decontamination process.Media inspection of a picture attached, and the reported error is not shown in the photo.Visual inspection of the accustick device was returned with the sheath, dilator and the canula stuck inside the device.It was observed that the ro marker was out of its location due it was separated from the accustick device.Additionally, the accustick device was damage at distal tip.No more damages were observed.The device was inspected under microscope, and it was observed that the distal tip was damage, this damage is located next to the ro marker position.
|