A healthcare professional reported that, during the intraocular lens implantation surgery, the intraocular lens got stuck in the injector.Additional information was received stating that, the event occurred during the progression of the lens in the injection system when injected in the patient's eye, there was patient contact.
|
The product was returned for analysis and the reported complaint was observed.The device was returned loose in the carton.The lock-out assembly has been removed.Viscoelastic is observed in the device.The plunger has been pulled out through the opened lens bay door.The lens is advanced at the nozzle entry.The lens is pressed down in the nozzle entry , which indicates a potential plunger override.We are unable to determine the root cause for the reported complaint.The plunger was pulled out of the nozzle.The position of the lens in the nozzle entry indicates a possible plunger override.Plunger override may occur: ¿ if the lens has become misaligned in the lens bay during the manufacturing process.¿ due to the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic.Material properties of non-qualified ovds may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.¿ if inadequate viscoelastic is placed in the device this will cause inadequate coverage of the lens fold path which may cause the lens to advance incorrectly or become ¿stuck¿ in the device allowing the plunger to override the lens.¿ if the operating room temperature is too high (> 23°c / 73° f) lens folding consistency is negatively affected, the lens is more adherent and this may inhibit lens advancement.Any of the above listed causes alone, or in combination, may create the reported event.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|