The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no indication of a lot specific product quality issue.Based on the reported information, the investigation determined that the reported failure to advance was the result of damage that occurred during tip shaping.It is likely that during tip shaping, the pressurewire tip was inadvertently damaged/broken resulting in failure to advance.It is likely that anatomical conditions contributed to the difficulties.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|