The initial reporter received questionable elecsys vitamin d assay results from five patient samples tested on the cobas 6000 e601 module.The reporter was able to provide the following examples of discrepant results: the initial results were not reported outside of the laboratory.Sample (b)(6).On (b)(6) 2023, the initial result was 3.00 ng/ml with a data flag.On (b)(6) 2023, the first repeat result was 3.00 ng/ml with a data flag.On (b)(6) 2023, the second repeat result was 13.44 ng/ml.This result was reported to the patient.Sample (b)(6).On (b)(6) 2023, the initial result was 3.00 ng/ml with a data flag.On (b)(6) 2023, the first repeat result was 3.00 ng/ml with a data flag.On (b)(6) 2023, the second repeat result was 13.42 ng/ml.This result was reported to the patient.Sample (b)(6): on (b)(6) 2023, the initial result was a data flag with no numerical result.On (b)(6) 2023, the first repeat result was 3.00 ng/ml with a data flag.On (b)(6) 2023, the second repeat result was 15.79 ng/ml this result was reported to the patient.Sample (b)(6).On (b)(6) 2023, the initial result was 80.06 ng/ml.On (b)(6) 2023, the first repeat result was 77.76 ng/ml.On (b)(6) 2023, the second repeat result was 44.65 ng/ml.This result was reported to the patient.
|
The investigation reviewed the calibration data.The calibration signals of calibrator 1 were too low and out of specification; a calibration issue is possible.The investigation reviewed the qc data; the qc was out of range on the day of event.In the qc history, qc level 1 was unusually low before the patient sample run but after a new calibration, no new qc runs were performed.For qc level 2, the result was higher on (b)(6) 2023 at 11:43 am; but there was no new qc result available after recalibration on (b)(6) 2023 at 12:08 pm.The qc was conspicuous as well.The investigation reviewed the customer's handling of patient samples.The patient sample was inverted 2-3 times; the investigation determined that the number of inversions was too low as at least 8-10 x 180° inversions are recommended.The serum coagulation time was 15 minutes; the investigation determined that the coagulation time was too short as more than 30 minutes is recommended.The investigation reviewed the alarm trace; the trace had repeatedly "abnormal sample aspiration" alarms which may indicate sample quality issues.The investigation determined there was no indication of a reagent issue.The cause of the event could not be determined. .
|