Model Number M00555640 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Pancreatitis (4481)
|
Event Date 12/13/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an acquire needle was used during an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (eus-fna) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.During the procedure there were no issues with the first two punctures; however, after the third puncture almost no specimen was obtained.In order to obtain a large amount of specimen, the puncture was performed five times.Post-procedure, the patient developed pancreatitis which in the physician's assessment was not due to a device defect.There was no information on how the pancreatitis was treated.The procedure was completed with the original device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block d4 and h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.However, the complainant reported that the device was not expired.Block h6: imdrf patient code e1021 captures the reported patient complication of pancreatitis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h2: additional information was received on january 5, 2024, that the lot is either 32002533 or 31915173; however, it is unknown which one.Lot 32002533: manufacture date 07/12/2023 and use before date/expiration 07/11/2026.Lot 31915173: manufacture date 06/28/2023 and use before date/expiration 06/27/2026.Block d4 and h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.However, the complainant reported that the device was not expired.Block h6: imdrf patient code e1021 captures the reported patient complication of pancreatitis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an acquire needle was used during an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (eus-fna) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.During the procedure there were no issues with the first two punctures; however, after the third puncture almost no specimen was obtained.In order to obtain a large amount of specimen, the puncture was performed five times.Post-procedure, the patient developed pancreatitis which in the physician's assessment was not due to a device defect.There was no information on how the pancreatitis was treated.The procedure was completed with the original device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|