Reported event: an event regarding pain/swelling involving an unknown knee was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "this case concerns a patient who underwent a cementless cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty who did well initially but after a fall and developed pain and stiffness and decreased range of motion necessitating a manipulation which caused further pain and symptoms.I can confirm that the patient had a total knee arthroplasty since i was able to review x-rays showing a postoperative right cementless cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.Documentation.The patient also, reportedly underwent revision surgery, but there is no documentation for that, so i cannot confirm that a revision was carried out.The causes of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty whether traumatic or nontraumatic are multifactorial including the magnitude of trauma, the damage to the supporting soft tissues of the knee, as well as surgical technique that would include positioning, fixation, ligament balancing and kinematics and satisfactory patella tracking.Regional complex pain syndrome can also be considered (rsd).The causes of pain and clicking following this type of surgery are also multifactorial including similarly, surgical technique, positioning and fixation of the implants, restoration of ligament stability and kinematics as well as restoration of satisfactory patella tracking and rsd as well.Since i have no supporting documentation regarding revision surgery the root cause cannot be determined if indeed, the revision occurred.The x-ray reading provided by a physician assistant is not satisfactory to determine whether or not the implant is in satisfactory position, alignment, and whether or not, it is satisfactorily fixed.Further documentation, including the reason for the revision, the revision operation report and recent preoperative and subsequent postoperative revision x-rays should be provided." product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient continues to experience swelling post-implantation.A review of the medical records by a clinical consultant was unable to confirm the event as insufficient documentation related to the reported revision and thereafter was provided.Further information such as pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|