• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROPORT CRM S.R.L. VEGA; DRUG ELUTING PERMANENT RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) OR RIGHT ATRIAL (RA) PACEMAKER ELE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROPORT CRM S.R.L. VEGA; DRUG ELUTING PERMANENT RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) OR RIGHT ATRIAL (RA) PACEMAKER ELE Back to Search Results
Model Number VEGA R45
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Electromagnetic Interference (1194)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/19/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Reportedly, atrial lead noise in the vega r45 lead s/n: (b)(6) was observed on the egm a recorded when the device was interrogated on (b)(6) 2023.The physician decided to replace the pacemaker (not the lead) because the pacing threshold and resistance values were within normal limits and the noise was only recorded in the morning, it was determined that external electromagnetic interference was likely the source of the noise recorded, and reintervention to replace the pacemaker (not the lead) was performed as planned on (b)(6) 2023.According to the physician, if it was electromagnetic interference in daily life, he thought that noise would not be observed during the hospitalization period after the pacemaker replacement.However, upon interrogation on (b)(6) 2023 atrial lead noise was observed again as an atrial arrhythmia episode.
 
Event Description
Reportedly, atrial lead noise in the vega r45 lead (s/n: (b)(6)) was observed on the egm a recorded when the device was interrogated on (b)(6) 2023.The physician decided to replace the pacemaker (not the lead) because the pacing threshold and resistance values were within normal limits and the noise was only recorded in the morning, it was determined that external electromagnetic interference was likely the source of the noise recorded, and reintervention to replace the pacemaker (not the lead) was performed as planned on (b)(6) 2023.According to the physician, if it was electromagnetic interference in daily life, he thought that noise would not be observed during the hospitalization period after the pacemaker replacement.However, upon interrogation on (b)(6) 2023, atrial lead noise was observed again as an atrial arrhythmia episode.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6 evaluation code: health effect impact.No health consequence or impact.Summary of the investigation: review of provided data confirmed the reported atrial oversensing and the episodes recorded in the kora dr and eno dr devices memories showed oversensing and non-physiological signals (noise/artifacts) on atrial channel.The origin of these simultaneous non-physiological atrial signals and noise is unknown.As the lead remains implanted, it was not returned for investigation.Therefore, the exact root cause could not be determined.A careful monitoring of the atrial lead integrity should be performed to ensure the adequate sensing and pacing functionality.This case is retained and utilized for trending purposes.For more details please refer to the attached report analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VEGA
Type of Device
DRUG ELUTING PERMANENT RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) OR RIGHT ATRIAL (RA) PACEMAKER ELE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROPORT CRM S.R.L.
via crescentino s.n
saluggia (vc) 13040
IT  13040
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICROPORT CRM S.R.L.
via crescentino s.n
saluggia (vc) 13040
IT   13040
Manufacturer Contact
elodie vincent
via crescentino s.n
saluggia (vc) 13040
IT   13040
146013665
MDR Report Key18482353
MDR Text Key333093969
Report Number1000165971-2024-00041
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NVN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P130010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/10/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVEGA R45
Device Catalogue NumberVEGA R45
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-