Model Number 12TLW805F35 |
Device Problems
Deflation Problem (1149); Material Rupture (1546)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/20/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
As reported, before use in patient with this fogarty embolectomy catheter, the balloon could not be deflated.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was available for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product is expected to be returned for analysis; however, it has not yet been received.Upon the return of the product a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The fogarty catheter was sent to our product evaluation laboratory for a full evaluation.Customer report of 'balloon could not be deflated' was not able to be confirmed due to balloon condition as received.The balloon was found to be ruptured in the central area.The ruptured edges did not appeared to match at the ruptured location.No visible damage was observed from distal and proximal windings and catheter body and syringe.The through lumen was found to be patent and did not leak.The manufacturing records were reviewed and there is no indication of a related nonconformance; all process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.Per the ifu "balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures.And "to minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation volume and pull force for each size catheter".
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported, before use in patient with this fogarty embolectomy catheter, the balloon could not be deflated.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was received for evaluation.As per product evaluation findings, the balloon was found to be ruptured in the central area.The ruptured edges did not appeared to match at the ruptured location.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated: (component code, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Added: h6 (type of investigation).Further investigation was completed by the engineers in the manufacturing site.Based on the available information there is no evidence that supports or confirms the failure mode is associated to a manufacturing/design defect.Additionally, as part of the manufacturing process, units go through balloon and winding inspection process.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|