• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR ARMADA 18 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR ARMADA 18 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1013469-150
Device Problems Deflation Problem (1149); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/18/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.H6: medical device problem code 2017 - improper or incorrect procedure or method - contrast incorrect.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in superficial femoral artery (sfa).The 5.5x150mm armada balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was used in the procedure and the balloon was inflated twice to nominal pressure; however, during the second inflation the balloon failed to deflate, although negative was held for 3 minutes.The balloon was only partially able to be deflated; therefore, the balloon was cut to allow contrast to be removed from the balloon, so the bdc could be removed from the patient.There was no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay reported in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual and functional inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported deflation issue could not be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents and/or complaints from this lot.It was reported that the contrast mix used during the procedure was 30 percent contrast and 70 percent saline.It should be noted that the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) catheter, armada 18, ce, instructions for use (ifu, materials required section) specified that the contrast is diluted 1:1 with normal saline.In this case, since the contrast ratio used was less than the required percentage it is unknown if the ifu violation caused or contributed to the reported complaint.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported deflation issue.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARMADA 18 PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 3005718570 (P099)
cashel road
clonmel tipperary
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key18487481
MDR Text Key332601415
Report Number2024168-2024-00562
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
UDI-Device Identifier08717648208331
UDI-Public08717648208331
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151317
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/10/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1013469-150
Device Lot Number3022041
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-