• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK AG, BUELACH, SWITZERLAND OSCAR 3/20-180/127; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK AG, BUELACH, SWITZERLAND OSCAR 3/20-180/127; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 454334
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/14/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
An oscar peripheral multifunctional catheter system was selected for treatment of a moderately calcified cto in the mid-section of the anterior tibial artery.A 200cm v-14 guide wire was used in combination with the oscar.First inflation with 8bar could be successfully performed.During the attempt to advance the guide wire further distal, the wire looped, and the oscar pta was pushed forward.Guide wire got damaged and showed a wrinkling at the distal end.It was not possible to remove the guidewire through the oscar pta.Therefore, wire was removed together with oscar pta.The hydrophilic coating of the wire at the distal end was peeled off and created the wrinkling.A new wire was introduced into the already used oscar pta and introduced into the patient.During the second attempt of inflation, it was noticed that the oscar pta balloon leaked.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
07-feb-2024 updated description an oscar peripheral multifunctional catheter system was selected for treatment of a moderately calcified cto in the mid-section of the anterior tibial artery.The occlusion could be crossed with a 0.014 inch guide wire, followed by the oscar dilator.The oscar support catheter could only follow up to the middle of the occlusion.The oscar dilator was exchanged with the 3.0 mm oscar pta balloon (complaint device), due to the short guide wire, the guide wire had to be withdrawn and backloaded outside of the patient.The oscar pta balloon was introduced and successfully inflated with 8 atm.After inflation of the balloon, the guide wire was pushed further but got looped and the balloon was pushed forward.The guidewire got damaged and showed a wrinkling at the distal end, following it was not possible to remove the guidewire.Both, guide wire and oscar pta balloon were removed, and a damage to the hydrophilic coating of the guide wire was confirmed.A new wire was introduced, and the balloon was positioned in the target lesion.A second inflation was not possible as the oscar pta balloon leaked.The physician assumed that the guidewire has damaged the oscar pta balloon.A second oscar pta balloon was introduced together with the new guide wire.During manipulation, the second guide wire got damages as well, the hydrophilic coating got peeled off (reported separately).Both, guide wire and second oscar pta balloon were withdrawn, and the intervention was finalized using a standard pta balloon.The returned product was subjected to a detailed technical analysis and the corresponding production documentation was reviewed to establish whether a deviation from the manufacturing process could be the cause for the reported event.The technical investigation revealed a damage to the tip and to the balloon, a long tear is visible along the entire tip up to the distal balloon shoulder confirming the narrative of the physician.The balloon has been inflated and was returned in a partially deflated state.Review of the production documentation confirmed that the product was manufactured according to specifications and passed all in-process and final inspections.In addition to visual inspections each product is tested for air tightness by means of a pressure test.We can therefore confirm that the product was delivered in a leak-proof condition.Based on the conducted investigations, no material or manufacturing related root cause could be determined.The root cause for the complaint event is most likely related to the guide wire used during the intervention (i.E., the guide wire cut the device tip).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OSCAR 3/20-180/127
Type of Device
CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK AG, BUELACH, SWITZERLAND
ackerstrasse 6
buelach CH-81 80
CH  CH-8180
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key18489686
MDR Text Key332995494
Report Number1028232-2024-00128
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K214038
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/10/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number454334
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Device Lot Number02232459
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/20/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/14/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-