Catalog Number ZVM08100 |
Device Problem
Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/21/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the e-luminexx vascular stent that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the e-luminexx vascular stent are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2026).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure in the external iliac artery through contralateral approach, the stent was allegedly too long and would reach the internal iliac bone.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the e-luminexx vascular stent that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the e-luminexx vascular stent are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.The problem was identified when the device was already advanced into the patient's vessel but there were no reports of device deficiency, and it is not known if there were device labelling concerns.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Investigation summary: the stent delivery system sample was not returned for evaluation and photos were not provided which leads to inconclusive results.Review of a work order label was reviewed and showed that the device was properly labeled after production.Based on available information and as the sample was not returned for evaluation, the investigation is closed with inconclusive result for stent length deficiency.A definite root cause of the reported issue cannot be identified.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product, it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risk.The instruction for use provides a table for accurate selection of the stent length to be used.With regards to stent selection, the instruction for use state: "evaluate and mark the stricture.Measure the length of the stricture and the diameter of the target lumen to assist in stent selection.Select the appropriate length of stent to traverse the stricture.Allow approximately 5 ¿10 mm of the stent to extend beyond each end of the stricture.This will allow for adequate stent coverage at either end of the stenosis".H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2026), g3 h11: h6 (method) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure in the external iliac artery through contralateral approach, the stent was allegedly too long and would reach the internal iliac bone.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|