• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 7300TFX
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Gradient Increase (1270); Perivalvular Leak (1457); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Thickening of Material (4056)
Patient Problem Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446)
Event Date 12/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the subject device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that this 78 year old patient with a 7300tfx31mm valve implanted in mitral position underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of five (5) years and nine (9) months due to leaflet thickening, mitral stenosis (ms) and severe mitral regurgitation (mr) and partial segment of dehiscence along anterior portion of surgical valve with severe pvl.Lvef40%.The patient presented with dyspnea and signs of heart failure before the viv procedure.A 29 mm transcatheter valve was successfully implanted within the pre-existing surgical device.The patient was discharged home.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added information to section d4 (expiration date), h4 (device manufacturer date), h6 (device code), h6 (type of investigation), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).Corrected data h6 (device code): "2907 - detachment of device or device component" code removed.H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The device was not returned for evaluation as it remained implanted after the valve-in-valve (viv) procedure, therefore customer report of structural valve deterioration could not be confirmed by product evaluation.Tissue degeneration-related structural deterioration, either calcific or non-calcific, are common chronic failure modes for this type of bioprosthetic heart valve.Operational mechanical stress and biological factors are generally believed to be the major contributors to the non-calcific bioprosthetic tissue degeneration.Structural valve deterioration (svd) can, and typically does, lead to chronic central leaks over a period of time.Svd is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, noncalcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Degeneration-related structural deterioration is most commonly related to patient factors and is not usually an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.Device dehiscence may occur early or late.When it occurs in the early post-operative period, it is typically a result of inadequate device implantation in combination with friable myocardial tissue.Late dehiscence can occur as a result of successive dilatation of cardiac structures that result from progression of disease.Valve dehiscence is not a malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency of the device.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient factors likely caused or contributed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
one edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key18503259
MDR Text Key332782467
Report Number2015691-2024-00336
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860057
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/13/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/12/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2021
Device Model Number7300TFX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention; Life Threatening;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight69 KG
-
-