• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 7300TFX
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Rupture (2208)
Event Date 11/14/2023
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the device history record (dhr) review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Engineering evaluation summary: an engineering evaluation is not required because there is no allegation of a malfunction which could be related to a manufacturing non-conformance; no labeling non-conformance/deficiency; no use-related issue with a hazardous situation; no device-related infection; and there is no evidence of a product failure with regard to design, reliability, or use error.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.A capa/scar/pra is not required as there are no confirmed product or labeling non-conformances and no other triggers are met.The most likely cause is patient factors, including the poor quality of the patient's tissue.All pertinent information available to edwards lifesciences has been submitted.
 
Event Description
Through the implant registry, investigation and medical records it was learned a 33 mm 7300tfx mitral valve was explanted at implant due to disruption of the av groove of the mitral annulus due to the rigid ring of the mitral prosthesis and extremely poor quality of the tissues.The valve was replaced with a 31mm 7300tfx valve.The patient expired in operating room.Per information received the 33 mm 7300tfx did not malfunction and there was no deficiency.Per medical record: in or prior to explant of the native mitral valve, the pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 88mmhg and there were bilateral large pleural effusions.The patient underwent clipping of laa.The mitral valve was excessed in its entirety at the level of the noncalcified mitral valve annulus and the subvalvular apparatus removed.A rim of the annular posterior and anterior mitral leaflet was preserved.The tissue integrity noted as poor.It is noted the mitral annulus was grossly enlarged and the annulus significantly larger than the 33mm sizer.A 33mm 7300tfx was implanted.The valve noted to seat well.The patient was weaned from cpb, within a few minutes there was bleeding observed to be filling the pericardial well.On inspection the lateral wall of the lv was bleeding noted to represent a disruption of the av groove of the mitral valve annulus.Cpb was resumed the 33mm 7300tfx was explanted.There was significant disruption of the of the m annulus in the region of p1 and p2.This portion of the mitral annulus was noted as of particularly poor integrity.The disrupted portion of the mitral annulus was repaired with a patch reconstruction.A 31mm 7300tfx implanted.An intraoperative tee confirmed there was no pvl or regurgitation.A new second site of bleeding was soon observed.All attempts to control bleeding were unsuccessful.It is noted in attempting to reconstruct the mitral annulus, which was of extremely poor quality, the rigid ring of the mitral prosthesis was likely the culprit for annular disruption given the extremely poor quality of the tissues in general.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA MITRAL EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key18509782
MDR Text Key332868402
Report Number2015691-2024-00394
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103186291
UDI-Public(01)00690103186291(17)241201
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860057
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/14/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/14/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number7300TFX
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-