C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, KIT, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1806050J |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/25/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f are identified in d2 and g4.As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that sometimes post a port placement via left subclavian vein, the catheter was allegedly deformed.It was further reported that the catheter was allegedly found to be torn upon removal.Reportedly, the catheter was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one powerport implantable port attached to a groshong catheter was returned for sample evaluation.Functional, gross visual, tactile and microscopic visual evaluations was performed.Three parallel longitudinal splits were noted on the attached catheter approximately 3.5cm from the cath-lock.Upon infusion, a leak with thrombus from the longitudinal splits was observed on the catheter while water exited the distal end.Aspiration was attempted and was unsuccessful.Therefore the investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture issue.However the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported deformation issue as there was no deformation noted on the catheter.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that sometimes post a port placement via left subclavian vein, the catheter was allegedly deformed.It was further reported that the catheter was allegedly found to be torn upon removal.Reportedly, the catheter was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|