• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COLOPLAST A/S ALPHA I SCROTAL; PENILE PROSTHESIS, INFLATABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COLOPLAST A/S ALPHA I SCROTAL; PENILE PROSTHESIS, INFLATABLE Back to Search Results
Lot Number 0768384_5187401000
Device Problem Failure to Deflate (4060)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number was reviewed for complaint trend.No trends were noted for complaints.
 
Event Description
According to the available information the device was explanted and replaced due to the patient could not deflate the device.
 
Event Description
According to the available information the device was explanted and replaced due to the patient could not deflate the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Titan pump, cylinders 1 and 2, and reservoir were received for evaluation.Abrasion was noted on both exhaust tubes and the inlet tube of the pump.The surfaces of the detachment site of the shorter exhaust tube of the pump appear to be rough and irregular, indicating stress was exerted.Abrasion was noted the exhaust tube of cylinder 2.No functional abnormalities were noted with either cylinder 1 or cylinder 2.A separation was noted on the bladder of the reservoir.This is a site of leakage.The separation surfaces appear to have varying degrees of degradation.Based on examination of the returned product, it was concluded that while in-vivo both the exhaust tubes and inlet tube of the pump had overlapped and abraded against one another.While no functional abnormalities were noted during testing with the returned components, microscopic examination of the surfaces of the exhaust tube detachment end between the pump and cylinder 2 revealed rough and irregular surfaces, indicating stress was exerted.Based on the overlapping of the pump tubes, in combination with device usage over time, this could contribute to sufficient stress to separate the exhaust tubing of the pump.A separation of this type would then allow the loss of fluid, making the device inoperable.These components were released according to manufacturing and quality control procedures.The device was functioning properly for over 23 years in the patient.Material degradation occurred and progressed enough to cause mechanical failure to take place on the reservoir bladder.Occurrences of this nature are estimated to be relatively rare, and immune responses and in vivo reactions within the human body may largely influence causes for this type of event.A review of the device history record confirmed the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.No trends were noted for complaints and there were no nonconforming reports or capas that were confirmed to be associated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALPHA I SCROTAL
Type of Device
PENILE PROSTHESIS, INFLATABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COLOPLAST A/S
1 holtedam humlebaek, dk 3050
humlebaek 3050
DA  3050
Manufacturer Contact
usbes brian schmidt
1601 west river road n
minneapolis, MN 55411
MDR Report Key18525295
MDR Text Key333026928
Report Number2125050-2024-00089
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FHW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P000006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/17/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Lot Number0768384_5187401000
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-