• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY STRATA®; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY STRATA®; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN-S
Device Problems Infusion or Flow Problem (2964); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 12/22/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
B3.Please note that this date is based off the date of publication of the article as the actual event date was not provided.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.
 
Event Description
Peter y.M.Woo, desiree k.K.Wong, yixuan yuan, xiaoqing guo, michael k.W.See, matthew tam, alain k.S.Wong, kwong-yau chan.A morphometric analysis of commonly used craniometric approaches for freehand ventriculoperitoneal shunting.Operative neurosurgery 22 (2022).Doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000047 background: ventricular catheter tip position is a predictor for ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival.Cannulation is often performed freehand, but there is limited consensus on the best craniometric approach.Objective: to determine the accuracy of localizing craniometric entry sites and to identify which is associated with optimal catheter placement.Methods: this is a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting.The approaches were categorized as kocher¿s, keen¿s, frazier¿s and dandy's points as well as the parieto-occipital point.An accurately sited burr hole was within 10mmfromstandard descriptions.Optimal catheter tip position was defined as within the ipsilateral frontal horn.Results: a total of 110 patients were reviewed, and 58% (65/110) of burr holes were accurately sited.Keen¿s point was the most correctly identified (65%, 11/17), followed by kocher¿s point (65%, 37/57) and frazier's point (60%, 3/5).Predictors for accurate localization were keen¿s point (odds ratio 0.3; 95% ci: 01-0.9) and right-sided access (odds ratio 0.4; 95% ci: 0.1-0.9).Sixty-three percent (69/110) of catheters were optimally placed with keen¿s point (adjusted odds ratio 0.04; 95% ci: 0.01-0.67), being the only independent factor.Thirteen patients (12%) required shunt revision at a mean duration of 10 ± 25 mo.Suboptimal catheter tip position was the only independent determinant for revision (adjusted odds ratio 0.11; 95% ci: 0.01-0.98).Conclusion: this is the first study to compare the accuracy of freehand ventricular cannulation of standard craniometric entry sites for adult patients.Keen¿s point was the most accurately sited and was a predictor for optimal catheter position.Catheter tip location, not the entry site, predicted shuntsurvival.Reported events.- 3 patients experienced infection and 2 patients experienced overshunting which required shunt revision.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STRATA®
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY
5290 california ave
irvine CA 92617
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY
5290 california ave
irvine CA 92617
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key18527512
MDR Text Key333048239
Report Number2021898-2024-00056
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeHK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/17/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN-S
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN-S
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/12/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-