Block h6: imdrf device code a22 captures the reportable event of bands fell off the varix.Block h10: the returned speedband superview super 7 was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the returned ligator housing had three bands attached.The ligator housing teeth were in good condition, and the suture was broken.The handle slot had evidence that the trip wire was secured.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event of bands fell off the varix cannot be confirmed.Upon analysis, it was found that the ligator housing had three bands attached, and the suture was broken.The device (ligator housing) could have been placed incorrectly onto the varix when it was needed to suction it in order to use the bands on it, making the bands not catch the varix as it should.The suction problem could also have happened if the varix that was being treated was not grabbed correctly by the ligator housing; however, the suction part of the procedure is not something that the device does by itself, and this would only be seen on the procedure.The bands not being deployed might have to do with the technique used by the physician or the way the device is being handled when trying to deploy the bands with the handle.The returned suture thread was broken, since there is no information about a rupture of the suture, it is possible that the suture was broken at the time of removing the device.Therefore, the most probable root cause of this complaint is adverse event related to procedure.Block h11 (correction): block e1 (initial reporter address 2) has been updated.
|