• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CENTINEL SPINE PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE LARGE, 10MM; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CENTINEL SPINE PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE LARGE, 10MM; PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC Back to Search Results
Model Number PDL-L-PT10S
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Multiple Fractures (4519)
Event Date 02/29/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Patient was implanted with a prodisc l device at the l5/s1 level on (b)(6) 2023.Following the implantation surgery, the patient was found to have bilateral pars fractures at the index level.The patient is not experiencing any symptoms.The surgeon has determined that the patient will wear a brace and be re-evaluated in four months time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An mdr is indicated for this complaint.Patient was implanted with a prodisc l device at the l5/s1 level on (b)(6) 2023.Following the implantation surgery, the patient was found to have bilateral pars fractures at the index level.The patient is not experiencing any symptoms.The surgeon has determined that the patient will wear a brace and be re-evaluated in four months time.A review of the dhrs found no anomalies associated with the complaint.Complaint trending found that the rate of complaints is within the level defined in the risk documentation.A review of the risk documentation found that the hazards associated with the complaint are identified and mitigated to a level where the clinical benefits outweigh the risks.There are no previous issues or capas associated with the complaint.The pdl device remains implanted within the patient, therefore no device evaluation could be completed.Bracing was needed for the bilateral pars fractures.A cause for the fractures is unknown, and no anomalies were identified during the course of the investigation.The submission is 2 of 3 devices involved in this event.
 
Event Description
Complaint is a follow-up to mdr 2024-00006.Patient was implanted with a prodisc l device at the l5/s1 level on (b)(6) 2023.Following the implantation surgery, the patient was found to have bilateral pars fractures at the index level.The patient is not experiencing any symptoms.The surgeon has determined that the patient will wear a brace and be re-evaluated in four months time.One month into bracing the decision was made to remove the pdl implant.Removal was completed on (b)(6) 2024.Patient was revised to alif with posterior fixation screws.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An mdr is indicated for this complaint.Complaint is a follow-up to (b)(4).Patient was implanted with a prodisc l device at the l5/s1 level on (b)(6) 2023.Following the implantation surgery, the patient was found to have bilateral pars fractures at the index level.The patient is not experiencing any symptoms.The surgeon has determined that the patient will wear a brace and be re-evaluated in four months time.One month into bracing the decision was made to remove the pdl implant.Removal was completed on (b)(6) 2024.Patient was revised to alif with posterior fixation screws.A review of the dhrs found no anomalies associated with the complaint.Complaint trending found that the rate of complaints is within the level defined in the risk documentation.A review of the risk documentation found that the hazards associated with the complaint are identified and mitigated to a level where the clinical benefits outweigh the risks.The prodisc l device was returned and will be evaluated under exponent's approved device evaluation protocol.The evaluation will be recorded under report number (b)(4).The removal was completed due to the bilateral pars fractures.A cause for the fractures is unknown, and no anomalies were identified during the course of the complaint investigation.The submission is 2 of 3 devices involved in this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRODISC L PE-INLAY W/ X-RAY MARKER, STERILE, SIZE LARGE, 10MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CENTINEL SPINE
900 airport road
suite 3b
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
FRUH VERPACKUNGSTECHNIK AG
allmendstrasse 47
fehraltorf, 8320
SZ   8320
Manufacturer Contact
erin ward
900 airport road
suite 3b
west chester, PA 19380
MDR Report Key18537055
MDR Text Key333159887
Report Number3007494564-2024-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
UDI-Device Identifier00843193111708
UDI-Public00843193111708
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/18/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPDL-L-PT10S
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot Number2023-0250
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Manufacturer Received02/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/26/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-