There was no device available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported patient symptoms are a known risk associated with implant of these devices as indicated in the instructions for use.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device was assigned to this investigation.This investigation also assigned a most probable conclusion code of unintended use error caused or contributed to event.This conclusion was selected because the reason for malposition of device, erosion was determined to be inadvertent/unintentional interaction.Furthermore, according with the information in the event description, the device was on good condition when the package was open.The evidence from the product record review did not identify a potential product quality issue or new patient harm.Therefore, it can be concluded that inadvertent/unintentional interaction was the most probable cause of the complaint/event.
|