Catalog Number 103556000 |
Device Problem
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problems
Joint Dislocation (2374); Joint Laxity (4526); Physical Asymmetry (4573)
|
Event Date 01/19/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's hip was revised due to dislocation.The hip could not be reduced under sedation, so the surgeon performed an open reduction procedure.During the procedure, the surgeon removed and replaced the patient's original bi-polar head construct with a longer uni polar head construct, to increase the patient's leg length and femoral offset for increased stability.Unknown surgical delay.Doi: (b)(6) 2024.Dor: (b)(6) 2024.Affected side: right hip.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received.A.Was there any surgical delay related to the event? no.B.Was the liner a depuy product? if yes, please provide the product details.There was no mention of a liner.The construct did not include a liner.C.Was there any allegation against the femoral head? no.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information, which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained, that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.In order to determine if a lot related issue was possible, a worldwide complaint database search was performed.A worldwide complaint database search found no additional related reports against the provided product code/lot code combination.Based on the inability to find any additional related reports against the provided product code/lot code combination it is reasonable to conclude that there are no anomalies with regard to manufacturing or inspection contained in the device history records that would contribute to the reported event.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|