• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number NV-5-15-HELIX
Device Problems Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 01/03/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received a report that the concerto coil prematurely detached in the catheter.During fluoroscopy, unknown foreign material was found in the patient and the physician left the material remaining in the patient.The patient was undergoing surgery to close vessels supplying blood flow to an endoleak.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was severe.It was reported that upon initially deploying the concerto coil, the physician partially deployed the coil, but realized he would like a shorter length coil.Upon retrieval of the coil, the coil prematurely deployed partially inside the microcatheter.The pusher wire was retrieved and a separate wire was used to try and push the remaining coil out of the microcatheter.There was resistance in pushing the wire into the catheter somewhere in the microcatheter.Eventually a 1cc syringe was injected into the catheter to push the remaining part of the coil out of the microcatheter which was successful.The wire was then successfully re-introduced into the microcatheter and the microcatheter repositioned 2 additional 4x8mm concerto coils, which were successfully delivered and deployed.It was only after the successful completion of the case and when flushing the sheath after removing the microcatheter that a small very thin looking ribbon of material was noticed hanging out of the sheath.The physician attempted to retrieve the material but it broke in his hand.Upon flouro examination in cine-burst, it was noted a very thin radiopaque material was still in the patient in the track to the area of where the coil was deployed.It was unknown what the product was, but the physician did leave the material in the patient as is.It was reported coil separation/break/premature detachment occurred.The coil remained in the patient.There was no surgical or medicinal intervention required.The pushwire was not bent or broken.There was no friction or difficulty during delivery.The physician attempted to reposition the coil.He only attempted to take out the coil from the patient once to replace for a different size.The physician did not attempt to detach the coil.The physician did not rotate the delivery pusher during the procedure.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.Ancillary devices include a renegade straight microcatheter m001182530.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that no attempts to detach were made, they were simply trying to remove the coil to replace it with another size.The pushwire was not damaged.It only got kinked after it was removed on the field while coiling it to save for the rep.The coil uncoiled and was left in the patient.This was the first coil implanted.Two 4x8 coils were successfully implanted after this coil.It was decided that surgery was not needed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis of nv-5-15-helix, lotno:227307377 found the actuator interface securely attached to the coupler tube.No evidence of detachment using an instant detacher was found at this location.The break indicator was found with two breaks.All three segments were retained by the release wire.This is typically an indication of manual detachment attempts.The concerto pusher was bent at ~14.0cm from the proximal end; and bent at ~10.4cm form the distal end.The coin was found fully retracted out of the lumen stop.The shield coil was found stretched.The implant coil was already detached and not returned for analysis.Customer reported the implant remained within the patient.The retainer ring was found damaged.The coin was found undamaged.The inner diameter of the retainer ring could not be reliably measured due to the damaged condition.The coin was measured at three locations to be ~0.076mm @ 0.063mm, ~0.092mm @ 0.127mm, and ~0.095mm@ 0.275mm, which is within specifications (specification: 0.063mm ¿ 0.089mm @ 0.063mm, 0.075mm ¿ 0.105mm @ 0.127mm, 0.086mm ¿ 0.108mm @ 0.275mm).Based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer report of ¿p remature detachment¿ was confirmed.The break indicator was found broken twice and the coin/release wire were fully retracted out of the lumen stop.This would detach the implant coil as designed by the detachment subassemblies.However, customer reported no breaks or kinks to the pusher, and that the ¿kinked¿ did not occur until after the procedure when the device was coiled to send for analysis.Therefore, pusher break could not be confirmed to have occurred during the procedure.The retainer ring was found damaged, potentially contributing towards the reported premature detachment.In addition, the shield coil was found stretched and the pusher was found bent.These are usually indicative of advancing/retracting against high resistance or tortuous anatomy.As the implant coil and renegade micro catheter used during the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the implant coil and micro catheter towards the premature detachment could not be determined.Customer reported pushing the implant into the patient after it detached within the micro catheter, which is off label use.The renegade has an inner diameter of 0.021¿ (per boston scientific website) and is therefore compatible for use with the concerto coil.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO NYLON
Type of Device
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX  22570
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX   22570
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key18566804
MDR Text Key333516510
Report Number9612164-2024-00376
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536044937
UDI-Public00847536044937
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/23/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNV-5-15-HELIX
Device Catalogue NumberNV-5-15-HELIX
Device Lot Number227307377
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/06/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-