• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL STENT - VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL STENT - VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKENTERPRISE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Thromboembolism (2654); Restenosis (4576)
Event Date 12/02/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source and the following citation was reviewed:goertz l, zopfs d, pennig l, zaeske c, timmer m, turowski b, kaschner m, borggrefe j, schönfeld m, schlamann m, kabbasch c.Comparative analysis of the low-profile acclino stent and the enterprise stent for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.World neurosurg.2023 dec 2:s1878-8750(23)01702-3.Doi: 10.1016/j.Wneu.2023.11.138.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 38043742.Objective/methods/study data: objective:this dual-center study is a head-to-head comparison of the low-profile acandis acclino stent (a third-generation stent) and the firstand second-generation enterprise stent.Methods: patients who underwent stent-assisted coiling with either the enterprise or the acclino stent for unruptured aneurysms during an 8-year period were enrolled and compared for complications, clinical outcomes, and angiographic results.Primary outcome measures were ischemic stroke rate and mid-term complete occlusion rate.Propensity score adjustment was performed to account for small differences between the groups.Results: enterprise and acclino stents were used in 48 cases each.The overall rate of thrombotic complications was higher in the enterprise group than in the acclino group (20.8% vs.4.2%, hr: 6.6, 95%ci: 2.2-20.0, p=0.01, adjusted p<0.01), which translated into a higher rate of major ischemic stroke after enterprise treatment (6.3% vs.0%, hr: 2.1, 95%ci: 1.8-2.4, p=0.08, adjusted p<0.01).Mid-term and long-term angiographic follow-up showed complete occlusion rates of 83.3% and 75.0% for enterprise and 89.2% and 75.9% for acclino (both p>0.05).Retreatment rates were 10.4% in the enterprise group and 4.2% in the acclino group (p=0.42, adjusted p=0.10).Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected cerenovus device possibly associated with reported adverse events: enterprise stent.Adverse event(s) and provided interventions possibly associated with unidentified enterprise stent: qty 3 major ischemic stroke caused periprocedurally by a thromboembolic event (recognized procedural complication, thromboembolism) qty 1 in-stent thromboembolism (recognized procedural complication, arterial re-stenosis).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).This complaint is from a literature source and the following citation was reviewed:goertz l, zopfs d, pennig l, zaeske c, timmer m, turowski b, kaschner m, borggrefe j, schönfeld m, schlamann m, kabbasch c.Comparative analysis of the low-profile acclino stent and the enterprise stent for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.World neurosurg.2023 dec 2:s1878-8750(23)01702-3.Doi: 10.1016/j.Wneu.2023.11.138.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 38043742.Section d.4: the product catalog and lot numbers are not available / not reported.The unique identifier (udi) and expiration date of the device is not known.Section e.1: initial reporter phone: 0049 221 478 82735.Section h.4: the device manufacture date is not known as the device lot number is not available / not reported.Since the event is life threatening and it might result in permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure; or it could require medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure, it is to be considered serious.The event is reportable to the us fda.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STENT - VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CERENOVUS, INC.
325 paramount dr
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
303552-689
MDR Report Key18567574
MDR Text Key333537164
Report Number3008114965-2024-00119
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
H60001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/23/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKENTERPRISE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-