• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE INTEGRITY RX; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE INTEGRITY RX; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number RSINT35018X
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problems Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/15/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
An attempt was made to use one 3.5x18mm resolute integrity coronary drug eluting stent to treat a non-tortuous, non-calcified lesion with greater than 60% stenosis in the ostium left main (lm) coronary artery.The device was inspected with no issues.Negative prep was not performed.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was not encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during the delivery. it was reported that the stent was post-dilated using a 5.0mm non-compliant (nc) balloon.This resulted in the stent deforming in the lm, and loss of radial resistance.Thrombus formation occurred.A 4x18mm resolute integrity stent was deployed to cover the deformed 3.5x18mm resolute integrity stent.It was noted that there was an unawareness of the product's manufacturer serial identification (msid), leading to use of the 5mm nc balloon.Multiple other medtronic devices were used during the procedure.The patient is alive with no further injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the patient had a severely diseased left coronary system.The 5.0mm non-compliant (nc) balloon used for stent post-dilation was a non-medtronic device.The stented vessel recoiled to an unacceptable result, and malapposition may have occurred as the stent strut was in disarray under angiography.However, no intravascular was performed and this remains inconclusive.Thrombus formation occurred at proximal left anterior descending (lad) artery.The thrombus formation occurred after the percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) was performed on the lm.A medtronic advance ce aspiration catheter was used to treat the thrombus.There is no complaint against the advance ce device.It was believed that the thrombus was related to a fractured strut following off label over-expansion.However, no act test was obtained during the pci, and therefore it is not possible to rule out hyper-coagulability due to reduced heparinization.It was noted that there was an unawareness of the product's maximum stent internal diameter (msid), leading to use of the 5mm nc balloon.Multiple other medtronic devices were used during the procedure with no issues noted.There was no complaint against 4.00x18x resolute integrity stent.It was assessed that the thrombus event was directly related to the use of the relevant device.The patient was admitted in the intensive care unit (icu) as per hospital high risk pci protocol.Still image analysis: one image received from the account for review.The image shows the device label of multiple devices.One is of a resolute integrity confirming the lot and size of the device.Lot number 0011348406 and size 3.5mm x 18mm.Unable to confirm the reported event from the image provided.Cine image analysis: nine still fluoroscopic procedural images of the left coronary system were provided for review.A lesion in the left main and in the proximal lad were identified.Images confirmed the delivery and post deployment profile of the initial stent, but no deformation could be confirmed.The alleged thrombus could not be confirmed from the images.The delivery but not deployment of the second stent is confirmed.The images provided confirm that the left coronary system was treated but the alleged stent deformation or thrombus are inconclusive from the images provided.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: annex d codes added.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESOLUTE INTEGRITY RX
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18585997
MDR Text Key333774627
Report Number9612164-2024-00440
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMY
PMA/PMN Number
P110013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/26/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRSINT35018X
Device Catalogue NumberRSINT35018X
Device Lot Number0011348406
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/14/2024
Date Device Manufactured08/06/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age47 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-