As reported, during a procedure involving hepatic arteriography and embolization, a torcon nb advantage angiographic catheter separated.Femoral access was obtained, and a cook vascular sheath was advanced into the patient.Another manufacturer¿s 0.035-inch wire was used.The complaint device was opened and inserted into the sheath, approximately 0.5-centimeters, when the tip of the catheter separated in the sheath.Resistance was not encountered upon insertion of the catheter.The sheath and catheter were removed and replaced, and the procedure was continued.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.E1: name and address: name: (b)(6).G4: pma/510(k)#: preamendment.This report includes information known at this time.A followup report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Summary of event: as reported, during a procedure involving hepatic arteriography and embolization, a torcon nb advantage angiographic catheter separated.Femoral access was obtained, and a cook vascular sheath was advanced into the patient.Another manufacturer¿s 0.035-inch wire was used.The complaint device was opened and inserted into the sheath, approximately 0.5-centimeters, when the tip of the catheter separated in the sheath.Resistance was not encountered upon insertion of the catheter.The sheath and catheter were removed and replaced, and the procedure was continued.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The tip of the catheter was missing.The catheter measured approximately 79.5-centimeters from the distal end of the strain relief to the point of separation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformances on the lot.A review of complaint history found no additional relevant complaints for this lot number.The product ifu states ¿due to thinwall construction, extreme care must be exercised during manipulation and withdrawal.¿ a review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a component failure, unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies, contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|