• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROSOFT-10-AV; COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROSOFT-10-AV; COILS Back to Search Results
Model Number 100510H2HS-V-A2
Device Problems Break (1069); Stretched (1601); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/08/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for return to the manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been returned.The alleged product issue could not be confirmed.If the device is received at a later date, an investigation will be performed and a supplemental mdr will be submitted.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature coil detachment as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an embolization procedure of a recanalized a-com aneurysm.A coil could not be detached after multiple attempts with two detachment controllers.The doctor decided to remove the coil from the patient and found that the coil had stretched and broke off.Part of the coil was placed in the aneurysm and part in the parent artery.An atlas stent was used to secure the coil wire and the aneurysm was closed.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation conclusion: the investigation of the returned coil system found the pusher heater coil stretched, broken and entangled at the middle section, the yellow lead wire broken, and the implant not attached to the pusher with indications of activation observed on the pusher heater coil; however, the pusher's monofilament showed a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing excessive force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.As the lead wire was returned broken, this investigation could not test or assess the continuity or resistance of the pusher to determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the alleged non-detachment issue.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.
 
Event Description
Please see h6 and h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HYDROSOFT-10-AV
Type of Device
COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key18592372
MDR Text Key333894130
Report Number2032493-2024-00084
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00816777022998
UDI-Public(01)00816777022998(11)231011(17)280930(10)0000441885
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K080666
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/26/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number100510H2HS-V-A2
Device Lot Number0000441885
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/11/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-