Model Number ONXAAP-25 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Hematoma (1884)
|
Event Date 03/03/2013 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
According to the initial report, patient is subject #040 in the post-market clinical follow-up study protocol of the on-x ascending aortic prosthesis (aap) retrospective study and was implanted on (b)(6) 2013 with a prefabricated aap device sn # (b)(6).On 3mar2013 (55 days post implant) while he was in the hospital recovering from repair of a periaortic leak with a large pseudoaneurysm he noted his left pupil was dilated.A ct of the head was performed and showed small right frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhage and a stable but slightly enlarged left tentorial subdural hematoma.Patient was diagnosed with a right frontal lobe iph from septic embolus according to reporting from the site on the digital crf.Pt was discharged home on (b)(6) 2013 to follow up with cardiology, infectious disease and neurology.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to artivion is accurate or has been confirmed by artivion.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Per the adjudication received, this event is not valve related.Per medical device reporting for manufacturers - fda guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff, section 2.16 an mdr report is not required when "you have information that would enable a person who is qualified to make a medical judgment to reasonably conclude that your device did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, or that a malfunction would not be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, if it were to recur." therefore, further investigation is not warranted.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the initial report, patient is subject (b)(6) in the post-market clinical follow-up study protocol of the on-x ascending aortic prosthesis (aap) retrospective study and was implanted on (b)(6) 2013 with a prefabricated aap device sn (b)(6).On (b)(6) 2013 (55 days post implant) while he was in the hospital recovering from repair of a periaortic leak with a large pseudoaneurysm he noted his left pupil was dilated.A ct of the head was performed and showed small right frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhage and a stable but slightly enlarged left tentorial subdural hematoma.Patient was diagnosed with a right frontal lobe iph from septic embolus according to reporting from the site on the digital crf.Pt was discharged home on (b)(6) 2013 to follow up with cardiology, infectious disease and neurology.Receipt of the adjudication form deemed the event not valve related.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|