• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72KIT
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/31/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the left m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a non-penumbra sheath, and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician completed one pass using the red72 and sheath.While reconnecting the red72 back to the iv drip, the physician noticed that the red72 was leaking at the proximal end, near the hub.Therefore, the red72 was removed.The procedure was completed using a penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68) and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed a leak coming from underneath the strain relief near the hub.Evaluation revealed a kink near the hub of the catheter and hole at the kinked location underneath the strain relief.This type of kink and a subsequent fracture typically occurs if the device is held at an angle during use.It was reported that the leak was noticed while reconnecting the red72 back to the iv drip during use.Further evaluation revealed multiple consecutive kinks along the distal shaft, and the distal tip was damaged.This damage is incidental to the reported complaint and typically occurs if the device is advanced against resistance during use.Based on the reported event, the root cause of resistance could not be determined.Penumbra devices are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following sections were incorrectly reported on the follow-up #01 and are being corrected on this follow-up #02 mfr report: 3005168196-2024-00033.1.Section h.Box 6.Results code 3.2.Section h.Box 6.Results code 4 - should be blank h3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18596949
MDR Text Key334837045
Report Number3005168196-2024-00033
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948023949
UDI-Public815948023949
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K211654
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,04/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/29/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED72KIT
Device Lot NumberH00003737
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received01/14/2005
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/03/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-