Device evaluation: the rod was returned to nuvasive for evaluation.Upon receipt of the device, a visual inspection was conducted and score marks were observed on the distraction rod which is typically associated with periodic distraction.In-house device x-rays determined that the radial bearing was broken.Functional testing was attempted, but the rod was not distracting or retracting, therefore, the reported failure was confirmed.The device was then sectioned and confirmed that the radial bearing was broken and the o-ring was torn.This torn o-ring could have been caused by the force that created the scoring marks.If the o-ring seal was compromised, that could have led to the degradation of the bearing, which ultimately broke and caused the failure to distract.Device record review: a review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the device was manufactured by the specified requirement at the time and met all the required quality inspections and specifications prior to shipment.If any additional information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
There was observable debris between the interface of the distraction rod and the housing body.Sectioning of the rod was performed and it visually confirmed the broken bearing.Sectioning also revealed a significant amount of black debris, likely titanium, in the housing body.The o-ring was also observed damaged/torn and one side of the rod was shinier than the other as the anodization was rubbing off.A closer look at the rod¿s anti-rotation tabs found one was completely worn.The root cause of the failure to distract event is unable to be determined, however, it is likely that the debris found surrounding the bearing made it seize and break.When it is coupled with the debris in the housing tube causing frictional forces between the two sliding surfaces of the rod, it would allow for the housing tube to impede distraction.
|