Product complaint # = > (b)(4) information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section e1.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6) the device was discarded; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.A device history record (dhr) was performed, and it indicated this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.Incomplete stent expansion is a known potential procedural complication associated with the enterprise 2 vrd.With the information provided and without the return of the associated devices, it is not possible to determine the root cause of the event.However, the event may have been related to a combination of multiple factors experienced in the clinical setting rather than the design or manufacture of the device.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
As reported by the field, during an endovascular embolization to the left middle cerebral artery, an enterprise2 4mmx16mm intracranial stent ((b)(6), 8314211) was placed in target site and tried to release.The distal stent makers did not fully open or expand as intended.The physician retracted the stent and switched to a new one to complete the surgery.The microcatheter was not replaced.Additional event information received on 26-jan-2024 indicated that the temperature indicator label on the inner pouch was checked and found to be within acceptable criteria.There was no resistance during advancement of the device.The stent did not appear damaged.There were no vessel or aneurysm factors that may have contributed to the incomplete expansion.No additional intervention was performed to attempt to expand the stent.The size of the unspecified microcatheter was 0.021.There were no procedural delays due to the event.
|