The following was published in the journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 35.1: 86-93.John wiley and sons inc.(jan 2024).In an article titled "pulsed-field ablation does not induce esophageal and periesophageal injury¿a new esophageal safety paradigm in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation", dirk grosse meininghaus md; doi: 10.1111/jce.16132.Between december 2022 and february 2023, 20 patients undergoing pfa (farapulse, boston scientific) for atrial fibrillation (af) were studied and compared with a previous cohort of 57 patients who underwent thermic pvi.Following pfa-pvi, none of the patients had mucosal lesions, food retention, or ablation-induced vagal nerve injury; four patients showed periesophageal edema.In contrast to thermic ablation tools, pfa is not associated with relevant esophageal and periesophageal injury, and might, therefore, reduce or eliminate the risk of potentially lethal aef in interventional treatment of af.The etiology of ablation-induced periesophageal edema is unknown but has not been shown to be related to lesion progression.Following ablation with thermic energy sources, esophageal or periesophageal injuries were observed in thirty three patients.Vagal nerve injuries were observed in seventeen patients following thermic ablation.
|
The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported esophageal, periesophageal, and vagal nerve injuries remain unknown.
|