The reported event was confirmed ¿ user related.The reported failure was able to be reproduced.The product was used for urological care.The product had caused the reported failure.Based on evaluation.Observed the catheter was cut into two pieces.Sample has been examined under microscopic.The catheter shaft looks like it has been cut with applied force that could cause the catheter to split into two.Based on entry description, the catheter was broken due to patient tear it off.The potential root cause for this failure mode could be user related since the patient had torn off the catheter.The labeling and instructions for use were found to be adequate.The dhr review could not be performed without a lot number.Therefore no additional action required at this time.Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
It was reported that a foley catheter was inserted on (b)(6) 2023, and foley was amputated on (b)(6) 2023, probably due to tearing off by the patient.As per the additional information received on 17jan2024, the event was also summarized as that the catheter had ruptured and there was a broken piece inside the patient's body.At the time of catheter rupture, the catheter remains inside the bladder.After that, the torn catheter was removed with forceps under cystoscopy, and the doctor determined that there was nothing left in the bladder.It was unknown what medical intervention was provided.
|