• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION ACTIVA; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION ACTIVA; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS) Back to Search Results
Model Number 37612
Device Problems Unintended Collision (1429); Delayed Charge Time (2586); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure (3023)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient experienced a fall on their back in summer.The patient is now experiencing that the recharge sessions take much longer and that the recharger keeps losing connection within the recharge session.This is also the case with the new wireless recharger.It seems it became more difficult to connect the recharger to the neurostimulator. additionally, the patient sometimes receives an oor message on the patient programmer. the patient does not let the battery go below 50%.Additionally, during the last impedance test the impedance values were all in range.However, in december it occurred that it was not possible that measure the impedances for the left hemisphere.The patient is still receiving effective therapy.An x-ray will be performed to verify the position of the neurostimulator in the pocket.  the session report did not show any irregularities, all measured impedance values are within range.In the recharge sessions in the report it is seen that the patient recharged the neurostimulator for short times from the 21st (b)(6) to 23rd (b)(6).Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) that the cause of the event has not been determined.An x ray is scheduled to determine if the stimulator has turned in the pocket.Patient also has a pocket adaptor.Once an x ray has been taken, then a course of action will be determined.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) that the x-ray showed the battery is positioned correctly in the patient.
 
Event Description
The session report does not show any irregularities and all measured impedance values are within range.In the recharge sessions the reports shows the patient recharged the ins for short times from 21st january to 23rd january.The x-ray confirmed there are no cables along the ins in front.Its also a parallel implant with the skin and doesn¿t bend inwards or outwards.Since shutting it off, the patient does experience that she can charge better and shorter charging times, which sounds normal at 1.5 hours every four days.However the patient mentions that the charger after 12 seconds of charging comes with a three tone beeping sound but still continues to charge.The impedance were all in good range when these were measured in a sitting and standing position.Additionally, they adjusted the stimulation settings and the physician indicated the patient is no longer experiencing issues connecting the recharger to the ins and the oor message no longer appears on the programmer.No abnormalities were seen in the recharge statistic in the session report.Only on the 19th of february the recharger might have lost the connection with the ins shortly.However, the ins was fully charged.Agent reviewed charging times and coupling.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (MOTOR DISORDERS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key18615895
MDR Text Key334263864
Report Number2182207-2024-00361
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeDA
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/31/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number37612
Device Catalogue Number37612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/08/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-