Additional information: initial report from facility stated "yes" to patient injury; however, no further details of the injury has been received despite our attempts to obtain same.Investigation findings: the mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) -the dhr was reviewed and shows no abnormalities related to the reported failure.Failure analysis - the investigation of the returned unit showed that the unit had slight rotational and lateral movement in the lock, but when the clamp was properly positioned and put under pressure, it would not move.Since the unit was involved in a patient injury, it was sent to quality engineering (qe) for further investigation.Qe confirmed the findings of the service & repair report and noted wear on the starburst teeth.New components were added to replace worn internal parts, and general maintenance and cleaning were performed.Root cause - evaluation found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint.The probable root cause is improper or suboptimal placement of the skull clamp on the patient.No further investigation is required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|