Model Number 83779 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Stretched (1601)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 01/05/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the coil broke and was partially recovered.The target lesion was located in the left internal iliac artery.A 10mm x 50cm interlock was selected for embolization of the superior and inferior gluteal artery.The coil was successfully implanted in the left internal iliac artery.Upon removal of the microcatheter, it was noted that there was a marker-like object observed in the non-boston scientific guide catheter near the entrance area.The coil was considered to have been stretched; therefore, the coil was recovered.During imaging, two marker-like objects were observed.The coil was slowly pulled out and the marker-like object disappeared.The procedure was completed with another renegade with the same specs.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the coil broke and was partially recovered.The target lesion was located in the left internal iliac artery.A 10mm x 50cm interlock was selected for embolization of the superior and inferior gluteal artery.The coil was successfully implanted in the left internal iliac artery.Upon removal of the microcatheter, it was noted that there was a marker-like object observed in the non-boston scientific guide catheter near the entrance area.The coil was considered to have been stretched; therefore, the coil was recovered.During imaging, two marker-like objects were observed.The coil was slowly pulled out and the marker-like object disappeared.The procedure was completed with another renegade with the same specs.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H6 - impact code updated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H6 - impact code updated.Device evaluated by mfr: only the coil of the pusher wire was returned.It was observed that this part completely detached of the pusher wire and also was stretched.The functional could not be performed due no complete device was returned.The dimensional could not be performed due no complete device was returned.No other issues were identified with the device and no patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the coil broke and was partially recovered.The target lesion was located in the left internal iliac artery.A 10mm x 50cm interlock was selected for embolization of the superior and inferior gluteal artery.The coil was successfully implanted in the left internal iliac artery.Upon removal of the microcatheter, it was noted that there was a marker-like object observed in the non-boston scientific guide catheter near the entrance area.The coil was considered to have been stretched; therefore, the coil was recovered.During imaging, two marker-like objects were observed.The coil was slowly pulled out and the marker-like object disappeared.The procedure was completed with another renegade with the same specs.No patient complications were reported.It was further reported that the coil was fully deployed.The coil was partially recovered.The recovered coil was unraveled, it was thought that the broken coil was probably left behind, and it was thought that it might remain in the body.If the recovered coil was the full length of the coil, it had been recovered all, but it was not clear whether the coil was broken or if the entire length had been recovered.It was not sure because the coil was stretched.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the coil broke and was partially recovered.The target lesion was located in the left internal iliac artery.A 10mm x 50cm interlock was selected for embolization of the superior and inferior gluteal artery.The coil was successfully implanted in the left internal iliac artery.Upon removal of the microcatheter, it was noted that there was a marker-like object observed in the non-boston scientific guide catheter near the entrance area.The coil was considered to have been stretched; therefore, the coil was recovered.During imaging, two marker-like objects were observed.The coil was slowly pulled out and the marker-like object disappeared.The procedure was completed with another renegade with the same specs.No patient complications were reported.It was further reported that the coil was fully deployed.The coil was partially recovered.The recovered coil was unraveled, it was thought that the broken coil was probably left behind, and it was thought that it might remain in the body.If the recovered coil was the full length of the coil, it had been recovered all, but it was not clear whether the coil was broken or if the entire length had been recovered.It was not sure because the coil was stretched.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: only the coil of the pusher wire was returned.It was observed that this part completely detached from the pusher wire and also was stretched.Functional testing and dimensional inspection could not be performed since the complete device was not returned.A picture was provided, and it was possible to observe that the coil was stretched.No other issues were identified with the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|