A company representative was informed about an incident involving an active lift.The reported incident occurred when the patient , was seated on the toilet with the lift positioned in front of her.Ms attempted to stand up using the lift, when the lift unexpectedly moved, causing patient to fell.The patient was caught by caregivers preventing her from landing on the ground.As a consequence of the event the patient sustained bruises on the arms.
|
The customer reported that the patient was seated on the toilet, with the sara stedy active lift positioned in front of them.The patient attempted to stand using the sara stedy lift (the castors' brakes were engaged), the lift moved away, resulting in the patient's collapse through their legs.The patient was caught by the caregiver and did not land on the ground.As a result of the event, the patient sustained a few bruises on the arms.After the event the device was inspected by an arjo representative, the lift functional test showed that the brake function does not always engage to the full brake position.The castor brakes were replaced by the technician.The device was manufactured in 2011 and has been used for approximately 13 years.The sara stedy device instruction for use contains information that: "the expected operational life of your arjohuntleigh lift is ten (10) years from the date of manufacture." also, the preventive maintenance section in instruction for use indicated that before every use customers should check the rear castor brake function.The reported event was a sequence of unfortunate events, the reported castor brake malfunction by itself does not lead to patient fall.Looking at the incident scenario it has been established that a floor lift was used for patient handling at the time of the event.The brake malfunction was found, and from that perspective the device did not meet its specification.The complaint was decided to be reportable due to the allegation that the patient fell during transfer.
|