|
Catalog Number 05.001.201 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Unintended System Motion (1430)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/01/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.D10: concomitant device: lid device, therapy date: (b)(6) 2024 udi:(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from mauritius that the battery handpiece device trigger was defective and run even though the trigger was not pressed while in use with the lid device.It was not reported if the device was used in surgery, or if there was patient involvement.It was not reported if there were any delays in the surgical procedure, or if a spare device was available for use.It was not reported if there were any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The date of event was unknown but was known to have occurred in 2024.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device the housing was damaged, the device failed leak tightness test, the color band was found to be chipping/fading, both pushers were stiff to use, the gears were found to be corroded and had unintended motion.The device also failed pretests for markings, leakage test using bubble emission technique, check the attachment coupling check for sticky triggers, check falling out protection, check for unintended motion and check function of new version falling out protection.Therefore, the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was traced to component failure due to normal wear.The service history record review result was not relevant to the current complaint and service process findings.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|