• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P SLIDING CORE, UHMPWE, 7MM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, UNCEMENTED, NON-CONSTRAINED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P SLIDING CORE, UHMPWE, 7MM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, UNCEMENTED, NON-CONSTRAINED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400-141F
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 10/02/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery, on (b)(6) 2023, customer care representative, emailed a delivered goods form for a star total ankle revision surgery to fa complaints inbox.The star total ankle revision case was a poly swap (400-141f, sliding core uhmpwe, 7mm) which was done at (b)(6) hospital by dr.(b)(6) on a 76 year old female patient.Regional account coordinator, emailed independent sales representative, who was present at the case for details regarding the poly swap.Sage stated that the original implant of the 400-141f was done about 7 years ago.Dr.Saw the patient back for taa follow up and the 400-141f "appeared to be broken on x-ray due to metal wire being split in half.Wire disengaged from the poly, was broken, but the sliding core appeared to be intact with minimal wear".The explanted 400-141 was discarded by the facility however, sage provided a picture of the 400-141f.There were 4 similar complaints identified for star poly component breaking.Previous complaint 22-11-001 was investigated and documented by stryker, so the root cause remains unknown.Additionally, the root cause for similar complaint (b)(4) remains unknown.Thus, the previous complaints do not aid in the investigation for this complaint, ccr 23-10-002.Dhr review was not conducted due to the complaint part not being returned and the lot number remaining unknown.The broken poly was not returned to the houston site, so visual and dimensional inspection did not occur.The reporter provided a photo of the broken poly, and it was confirmed to be damaged.The two x-ray wires are confirmed damaged and outside of the poly the reporter stated "poly appeared to be broken on x ray due to metal wire being split in half.Wire was disengaged from the poly, was broken, but the sliding core appeared to be intact with minimal wear".Simulated use testing did not occur.Per r&d engineer coo, "during sbi's initial wear testing they had some instances of wire fracture or push out (per the test report) this type of breakage in the wire is expected to occur on the bench because the cycling of the polyethylene under high loads causes it to flatten slightly and expand outwardly, exerting circumferential pressure on the wire that leads to breakage.These extreme conditions would not be expected to occur in vivo.Moreover, even under such conditions, the wire protruded from the polyethylene but did not dislodge.This situation is not expected to present a clinical risk in vivo, and in fact, was not observed during the clinical trial." the sbi test report is consistent with the explanted poly.The poly is intact, with slight damage to one of the corners.The wire is broken in half.Based on the information provided and the sbi test report, the root cause shall be attributed to wear and tear - other.
 
Event Description
On 10/03/2023, customer care representative, emailed a delivered goods form for a star total ankle revision surgery to fa complaints inbox.The star total ankle revision case was a poly swap (400-141f, sliding core uhmpwe, 7mm) which was done at (b)(6) hospital by dr.(b)(6) on a 76 year old female patient.Regional account coordinator, emailed independent sales representative, who was present at the case for details regarding the poly swap.Sage stated that the original implant of the 400-141f was done about 7 years ago.Dr.Saw the patient back for taa follow up and the 400-141f "appeared to be broken on x-ray due to metal wire being split in half.Wire disengaged from the poly, was broken, but the sliding core appeared to be intact with minimal wear".The explanted 400-141 was discarded by the facility however, sage provided a picture of the 400-141f.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SLIDING CORE, UHMPWE, 7MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, UNCEMENTED, NON-CONSTRAINED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758
Manufacturer Contact
james mcmahon
9800 metric blvd
austin, TX 78758
MDR Report Key18655379
MDR Text Key334722202
Report Number1644408-2024-00209
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/06/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number400-141F
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-