• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P STAR; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, UNCEMENTED, NON-CONSTRAINED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P STAR; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, UNCEMENTED, NON-CONSTRAINED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 10/24/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery,on (b)(6) 2023, independent sales representative, submitted a star poly swap revision case sheet to enovis f&a.The case took place at st.Alphonsus regional mc boise on (b)(6) 2023 on a 72 year old male patient.The original implant surgery took place at the same facility in 2021.Per independent sales representative "dr revised this surgery from 2021 (no previous case info available) due to the poly becoming oxidized.The patient began to form cysts around the implant site causing the need for revision and new poly placement." the replacement poly implanted is a 99-0028-11f (revision sliding core star ankle 11mm).The explanted poly was retrieved and will be sent back to exponent for further investigation.There were 5 similar complaints identified for star poly component damage.The previous complaints do not aid in the investigation for this complaint, (b)(4).Dhr review was not conducted due to the complaint part not being returned and the part and lot number remaining unknown.The poly was not returned to the houston site, so visual and dimensional inspection did not occur.Simulated use testing did not occur.Per the reporter, the poly was revised "due to the poly becoming oxidized.The patient began to form cysts around the implant site causing the need for revision and new poly placement".As noted in section 6, (b)(4) is in process to improve the oxidative properties of the poly component.Based on the limited information and the poly not being returned to the houston site, the root cause shall remain as unknown.
 
Event Description
On 10/24/2023, independent sales representative, submitted a star poly swap revision case sheet to enovis f&a.The case took place at st.Alphonsus regional mc boise on (b)(6) 2023 on a 72 year old male patient.The original implant surgery took place at the same facility in 2021.Per independent sales representative "dr revised this surgery from 2021 (no previous case info available) due to the poly becoming oxidized.The patient began to form cysts around the implant site causing the need for revision and new poly placement." the replacement poly implanted is a 99-0028-11f (revision sliding core star ankle 11mm).The explanted poly was retrieved and will be sent back to exponent for further investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STAR
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, UNCEMENTED, NON-CONSTRAINED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758
Manufacturer Contact
james mcmahon
9800 metric blvd
austin, TX 78758
MDR Report Key18655992
MDR Text Key334725445
Report Number1644408-2024-00211
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/06/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-