The device log file analysis revealed that on the reported date of event a signal failure of the control responsible for the motor speed and motor direction occurred.The signal was not transmitted correctly leading to the reported turbo vent failure.The device has reacted on the detected deviation as specified by shutting down automatic ventilation to protect the patient from potentially hazardous output.The user was alerted to this by means of a corresponding alarm.Fresh gas dosage and manual ventilation remain available in this case.The operator has continued to use the device for some minutes in manual ventilation and has then switched it to standby.Based on the log entries the failure occurred only once.No comparable situation was recorded either before or after the reported event.Since then the device was continued to be used without further problems.As no component was replaced a further in-depth investigation was not possible and finally the root cause of the single failure could not be determined.However, based on similar reported events the issue most likely was caused by a sporadic failure of the motor control pcb.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|