• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO UPPER G.I.SCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO UPPER G.I.SCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number EG29-I10
Device Problem Poor Quality Image (1408)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 11/30/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Pentax of america, inc.Performed several good faith effort attempts to gather additional information regarding an initial customer reported on 30-nov-2023 of an image failure during use without leak and no patient harm involving video gastroscope model eg29-i10 serial number (b)(6).The user finally provided an email response on 11-jan-2024 with the following responses including a delay in the procedure which would require medical intervention such as additional anesthesia or prolonged hospital stay questions.Additionally, they noted the delay or medical intervention put the patient at risk for adverse events.In response to the above reply, pentax of america, inc.Submitted another set of questions again to gather further information, but have not yet received a response.This event meets the requirements for fda reportability; however, submission of this report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, manufacturer or product caused or contributed to the event.Customer reports image failure.Video gastroscope without leak.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
International medical device regulators forum (imdrf) adverse event reporting.Evaluation summary based on the investigation, during the inspection defects were detected in the cable and ccd camera.A potential root cause of these failures are physical impact (vibration, drop, shock) or fluid damage to ccd driver pcb.Physical impact (vibration, drop, shock) or fluid damage to ccd driver pcb occured image failure.A definitive root cause of the reported issue could not be identified.A device history record(dhr) review was performed by the manufacturer.The dhr review confirmed the endoscope was manufactured by pentax medical miyagi on 01-nov-2022 under normal conditions, passed all required inspections, and was released accordingly.Also, there were no reworks or concessions and the dates of approval for shipment and actual date shipped were confirmed as 01-nov-2022.Pentax medical america performed good faith effort to gather additional information regarding this event and provided an email response on 11-jan-2024 with the following questions.Q.Was the procedure for treatment or diagnostic purposes? a: treatment.Q.Was the patient already prepped for the procedure? a :yes.Q: was there a delay in the procedure which would require medical intervention such as additional anesthesia or prolonged hospital stay? a: yes.Q: did the delay or medical intervention put the patient at risk for adverse events? a: yes.Q: if this event involves a stuck accessory, did the accessory became stuck during the current procedure? a: no.Q: was the product used to complete the procedure? a: no.Q: was the procedure completed with another similar device? a: no.Q: was the procedure completed? a: no.Q: if the procedure was cancelled, was the procedure performed on another day? a: no.Rescheduled procedure pending.Q: was the patient recalled for further screening? a: no.Q: was the product removed from circulation immediately after the failure/event occurred and subsequently called in for service/replacement? a: yes.In response to the above reply, pentax medical america asked the customer the following questions again to gather further information, but did not receive a response.Q: it is described as a procedure for treatment, but what kind of treatment did they have? q: why couldn't the procedure be completed? i would like to know the reason, whether it was because they did not have a replacement scope, the patient's condition, or whether they had already determined that the procedure was not necessary.Q : why don't you do the procedure on another day? same as above, i would like to know the reason.Q: patient's current condition.Pentax medical has not received any further information for this event and therefore, considers this medwatch report closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENTAX
Type of Device
VIDEO UPPER G.I.SCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE
tsutsujigaoka 1-1-110
akishima-shi, tokyo 196-0 012
JA  196-0012
MDR Report Key18667404
MDR Text Key334951667
Report Number2518897-2024-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePE
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEG29-I10
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA02/07/2024
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/11/2024
Device Age12 MO
Event Location Hospital
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
-
-