• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SWAN-GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER FOR SVC INSERTION; ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SWAN-GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER FOR SVC INSERTION; ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY Back to Search Results
Model Number PE074F5
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Hold for rw 2.8 it was reported that during use of this pacing catheter, the lead got cut during lead extraction with a laser sheath.The customer was uncertain whether it got cut by the laser or by some other cause.It was confirmed that catheter got cut off inside the patients body.There was no patient injury.No additional intervention was required in response to the event.Patient demographic information requested but unavailable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned but the product evaluation has not been completed yet.A supplemental report will be forthcoming when the investigation is completed.A device history record review was unable to be completed as the lot number is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Our product evaluation lab received one bipolar pacing catheter with attached monoject 1.3 cc volume limited syringe at gate valve and a non-edwards contamination shield which was located on the catheter body between 40 cm and 53.3 cm proximal from catheter tip.The reported issue of catheter damage was confirmed.As received, the catheter tube was completely broken off at approximately 14.8 cm from catheter tip.The cross surfaces of the broken tube appeared blackened, and rough.The broken catheter body sections did not match up.Lead wires were also broken at the broken section.There was a puncture around half of the circumference near the broken section, and the puncture region was also blackened.A kink was found near the broken section also.It was able to open and lock the gate valve without any resistance.An engineering evaluation was performed to assess for any manufacturing related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.As part of the manufacturing process, 100 percent of the units go through an electrical continuity inspection and tip visual inspection.Based on the available information there is no evidence that supports or confirms the failure mode is associated to a manufacturing or design defect.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SWAN-GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER FOR SVC INSERTION
Type of Device
ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER, TEMPORARY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan diaz
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492017706
MDR Report Key18669506
MDR Text Key334913039
Report Number2015691-2024-00847
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LDF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K813521
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPE074F5
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/30/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-