• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL AMPERE¿ RF ABLATION GENERATOR; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL AMPERE¿ RF ABLATION GENERATOR; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number H700489
Device Problem Failure to Deliver Energy (1211)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/23/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During an atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia case, there was a delay due to the ampere rf generator.The tacticath df ablation catheter was positioned at the location of the slow pathway and as soon as the power on button was pressed for ablation, an alarm sounded saying impedance out of range.This was despite the impedance displaying a value of only 130 ohms.Connections to the ampere rf generator were confirmed and the auto flow settings were reset as they had reverted to the default.Ablation was attempted again with the same outcome.A replacement ground was used to resolve the issue but again even though the impedance was below the 150 ohm setting, no ablation could be delivered.A flexability se catheter was then connected to the ampere rf generator, using a different ablation extension cable.Again, the impedance was registering below the impedance cutoff of 150 ohms, but ablation could not be delivered because of the impedance issue.It was suggested to reboot the ampere rf generator which had been done previously but it was also asked which ablation ground was connected to the patient and ampere rf generator.It was a non-abbott device (conmed 410-2000) which was said to not be compatible with the ampere rf generator.However, this ground had been used for the last 18 months.A competitive ablation catheter with the stockert rf generator was used in order to complete the case successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
One ampere¿ rf ablation generator was received for evaluation.The reported event was confirmed by reviewing the log files.Based on the information and investigation provided to abbott, the root cause was isolate to software design.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.No non-conformances associated with the reported event were identified.A capa is related to this complaint investigation.The issue will continue to be monitored for trends and reviewed in qdr (quality data review).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMPERE¿ RF ABLATION GENERATOR
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL
one st. jude medical drive
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL
one st. jude medical drive
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer Contact
janna parks
5050 nathan lane north
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key18691139
MDR Text Key335313542
Report Number2184149-2024-00028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
UDI-Device Identifier05415067004895
UDI-Public(01)05415067004895(10)4995065
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P110016
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/12/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberH700489
Device Lot Number4995065
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/05/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-