A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The investigation of the returned web system found the heater coil windings stretched.The device passed continuity and resistance testing.The heater coil pet and implant tether were found melted, indicating that the device was activated using a detachment controller during the procedure; therefore, the damage to the heater coil windings likely occurred post-activation.The stretched heater coil windings are an indication that the tether could have been caught in between the coil windings and caused the heater coil to stretch when the delivery system was pulled/retracted during the procedure.The returned detachment controller was found to function as intended and would not have caused or contributed to the reported event.Potential complications as referenced on the ifu, include but are not limited to the following: hematoma at the site of entry, aneurysm rupture, emboli, vessel perforation, parent artery occlusion, hemorrhage, ischemia, vasospasm, clot formation, device migration or misplacement, premature or difficult device detachment, non-detachment, incomplete aneurysm filling, revascularization, post-embolization syndrome, and neurological deficits including stroke and death.This report addresses the first web used in the case.The second web used in the case is referenced under mfr report id: 2032493-2023-01105.
|
It was reported that during the embolization procedure, the web device was unable to detach using two different detachment controllers.A failed attempt was made to mechanically detach the web.The web device was recaptured using a microcatheter.The entire microcatheter and web were both removed together from the patient.The web was replaced with a different size web and after some additional detachment efforts, it was detached.The procedure was completed.There was no patient injury or intervention.
|