The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.Based on available information, the reported incomplete coaptation (slda, single leaflet device attachment), associated with the clip detachment from anterior leaflet, was related to challenging anatomy with enlarged atrium in conjunction with imaging difficulties.The reported image resolution poor was due to shadowing artifacts from echo imaging.The reported unchanged mr was due to the slda.The reported patient effect of mitral regurgitation, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported unexpected medical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
It was reported that a patient presented with grade 4 degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) and an enlarged left atrium for a mitraclip procedure.It was noted that imaging was challenging due to the enlarged atrium and shadowing from the steerable guide catheter (sgc).After deployment of a mitraclip ntw, a single leaflet device attachment (slda) occurred.The anterior mitral leaflet was detached.A second clip was attempted to stabilize the slda, but the mitral pressure gradient registered at 10mmhg.Despite the elevated mpg, the patient was stable and the gradient returned to baseline once the second clip was removed from the leaflets.It was decided to not implant a second clip.Per the physician, the mr was improved to grade 3-4, but this was possibly due to the slda position or anesthesia.Additionally, the physician believed the abnormal cardiac size contributed to the slda.There was no clinically significant delay and the patient was stable.
|