Section a2, a4 and a5: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3 - other (81): the intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6- health effect - clinical code 4581: no code available (device dislocation) attempts have been made to obtain missing information.However, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
Additional information: section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes section d9 - date returned to manufacturer: 07-mar-2024 section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.The lens was visually inspected under magnification revealing that the lens was cut in half.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues were observed.The compliant simplicity was visually inspected under magnification and no issues were observed.The customer provided photographs for evaluation.The first photograph displays the suspect simplicity on the plastic tray holder.No issues could be identified.The second photograph shows the suspect lens inside a glass vial; due to the quality of the photograph no issues could be identified.The complaint issue "instability of device after implantation" and "lens damaged" were not identified during product and photo evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|