• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR-18 DETACHABLE HYDRO; PERIPHERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR-18 DETACHABLE HYDRO; PERIPHERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 45-480204-L
Device Problem Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/25/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient was being treated for a hematoma bleed with a glidecatheter and a micro catheter.Once the bleed was canulated the first coil was placed and detached successfully.A second coil was placed and attempted to be detached multiple times unsuccessfully with a detachment controller.The physician decided to withdrawal the coil and unintentionally detached in the micro catheter.The coil was removed with the catheter in its entirety.There was no reported patient injury or intervention.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for return to the manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been returned.The complaint as described could not be confirmed.If the device is received at a later date, an investigation will be performed and a supplemental mdr will be submitted.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies difficult or premature coil detachment as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation conclusion the investigation of the returned coil system found the pusher returned without the implant attached, and the pusher hypotube kinked at the proximal section.The implant was returned separated from the pusher with the overcoil stretched and was stuck within the middle section of the microcatheter.The unit did not pass continuity and resistance testing.Further inspection of the pusher found the green lead wire broken and the clear pet damaged at the proximal solder joint, which is consistent with non-detachment.The pusher's monofilament showed a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.The microcatheter used in the procedure was found damaged at multiple areas, which may have caused or contributed to the separation of the coil from the pusher.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AZUR-18 DETACHABLE HYDRO
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key18723146
MDR Text Key336622974
Report Number2032493-2024-00139
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120630
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/24/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/16/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number45-480204-L
Device Lot Number2001155KB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/15/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-