Model Number NL478 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Heating (1287)
|
Patient Problems
Failure of Implant (1924); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was an issue with the product nl478 - univation f meniscal comp.T3 rm/lm 8mm.According to the complaint description, the patient underwent revision due to postoperative inlay wear.According to manufacturer's reporting evaluation in accordance with 21 cfr part 803, section 803.3, this event is considered reportable for the following reason - adverse event (not later than 30 days).The assessment for the reportability of this adverse event was based on the patient harm, revision.No further data was provided nor available.The adverse event is filed under aesculap ag reference no.(b)(4) (400641041).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: b5 - update.D10 - involved components added.H3 - yes, evaluation.H6 - codes updated.Investigation results: the provided meniscal component shows massive visible damages like material deformations /delaminations scratches and imprints on the gliding surface.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all leading device(s) lot numbers and the products found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are no similar complaints against the same lot number.According to manufacturer's reporting evaluation in accordance with 21 cfr part 803, section 803.3, this event is considered eportable for the following reason - adverse event (not later than 30 days).The assessment for the reportability of this adverse event was based on the patient harm, revision.Conclusion/preventive measures: on the basis of the current information a clear conclusion cannot be drawn.The provided x-ray figures give also no clear hint regarding the root cause for the massive signs of wear of the meniscal component.There is no indication for a material defect or manufacturing failure on the basis of the device history records.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not required.
|
|
Event Description
|
Update: according to the sales representative, the wear of the inlay was detected during an arthroscopy procedure.The femoral- as well as the tibial component were not removed; only the meniscal component was replaced.Involved components: no183z/ as univation xf femur cemented f4 rm - lot 52115487 (internal aesculap ag reference no.(b)(4)).No158z/ as univation xf tibia cemented t3 rm - lot 52119260 (internal aesculap ag reference no.(b)(4)).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|