Additional information received: 1.Please provide the size and location of the laceration.Approx.1 in laceration on scalp.5.Was there a revision/medical intervention required? yes, for care of laceration.6.Patient outcome/current condition? patient discharge from the operating room on date of surgery.Investigation findings: the mayfield composite series skull clamp (a3059) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) - the dhr was reviewed and shows no abnormalities related to the reported failure.Failure analysis - the investigation of the returned device found no device deficiencies that would have contributed to the reported complaint, as "slippage" could not be duplicated.The device had a slight up and down movement in the lock, but when the clamp was properly positioned and put under pressure, the clamp did not move.It is recommended that the unit be serviced as a precaution.Further, since patient injury was reported, the unit was sent to quality engineering for further investigation, and the findings of the service & repair report were confirmed.Qe noted there was wear on the starburst teeth along with minor movement in the lock; no additional device deficiencies were observed.The disk ratchet and retaining ring will be replaced, and general maintenance and cleaning were performed.Root cause - the complaint is not confirmed.The probable root cause is improper or suboptimal placement of the skull clamp on the patient.No further investigation is required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|