Continuation of d10: product id: gwbc30; product lot/serial number na; product type: guidewire; implant date na; explant date na.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
Medtronic received information that during implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the confida guidewire and delivery catheter system (dcs) were unable to cross through patient anatomy due to calcification and the angle of the wire.The decision was made to no longer use the transcatheter valve.A new, non-medtronic valve was implanted.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that 10 days following the valve implant, the patient complained of pain between the shoulder blades.Computed tomography (ct) revealed aortic dissection with hematoma noted at the distal bend of aortic arch.The patient is being monitored.Per the physician, they believed that the dissection was secondary to the delivery catheter system (dcs) crossing.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|