It was reported that, patient experience chronic essex-lopresti injury, left forearm and a failed left elbow radial head arthroplasty.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which the 21mm katalyst radial head and 6mm katalyst stem were explanted.The elbow was taken through a full range of motion and appeared to be much more stable with good restoration of a neutral ulnar variance.Satisfied with the reconstruction of the elbow joint.Then, repaired the lateral ligament complex in the tendon, the muscles utilizing 2-0 fiberwire interrupted suture.That significantly increased the stability, we were able to get full flexion, full pronation and supination and extension within about 15 degrees without any subluxation.Satisfied with the reconstruction of interosseous ligament, the forearm was taken through its motion with no subluxation, no instability.The patient tolerated the procedure well and was awakened and taken to the recovery room in stable condition.
|
H6: health effect - clinical code.Section h3, h6:the reported event was analyzed.Although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the 21mm katalyst radial head.Therefore, no investigation is deemed for the other device.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that the documentation shows that the third revision presented a "failed left elbow radial head arthroscopy¿ with head disassociation.The previously reported disassociated radial head led to the revision; however, definitive clinical factors which led to the head disassociation with loosened stem cannot be concluded and the choice of downsized components in the previous radial head arthroplasty, ¿somewhat lax¿ distal radioulnar joint with ¿some residual ulnar positive variance¿ post osteotomy/wrist arthroscopy could not be ruled out as potential contributing factors as component micro/macro-motion and ligament laxity is associated with component loosening.Additionally, it is unknown if the ¿significant¿ lateral capitellum void/defect was a result of the smaller diameter head articulation or a possible contributing factor to the event but per the surgical technique, the concavity of the head should match the convexity of the capitellum.Patient impact included the radial head disassociation/loosened radial head arthroplasty with 8mm ulnar variance and significant capitellum defect with subsequent radial head arthroplasty revision to competitor components under fluoroscopy and ligament repair.A post-surgical restorative phase would be anticipated.Device batch number was not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for katalyst¿ bipolar radial head system revealed that as with all internal fracture fixation devices, potential adverse effects include loosening or change in position of the implant or its components.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include ¿somewhat lax¿ distal radioulnar joint with ¿some residual ulnar positive variance¿ post osteotomy/wrist arthroscopy, size selected or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.B7: other relevant history, including preexisting medical conditions (e.G.,allergies,race,pregnancy,smoking and alcohol use, hepatic/renal dysfunction, etc.) h6: health effect - clinical code and medical device problem code.
|